GPS Survey

Do you own one of the following GPS units made for trucks? If so you are invited to participate in our GPS survey. Select your GPS from the list below. If you don't see your GPS please select "Other Unlisted GPS". After we get a few responses, we will start publishing the results. Please check back frequently.

 

 

 

GARMIN 465T

RAND McNALLY TND500

COBRA 7700 PRO

GOODYEAR GY500X

PC MILER NAVIGATOR

TELETYPE WORLDNAV

Other Unlisted GPS

Trucker Issues
At the Loading Dock! Detention pay? PDF Print E-mail
Written by David J   
Wednesday, 29 July 2009 17:00

Detention time is when a truck is detained at a shipper's or customer's loading dock beyond a reasonable period of time. Generally in the industry, 2 hours are needed for loading or unloading a truck. Unfortunately many Shippers and Receivers generally do not care how long a driver has to sit without pay even though the time at the dock goes against the drivers hours of service (HOS). The shippers/receivers who  pay detention are generally pretty efficient at getting a truck going. It is those companies who refuse to pay detention time who take their sweet time loading or unloading a truck. Some companies will hold up a truck for the entire day before loading or unloading, sometimes longer. And remember that a driver is legally required to log this time as "On Duty Not Driving". Work without PAY. And it counts against his 70 week.

Other freight industries get and receive detention or demurrage pay. For instance the railroads after dropping a railcar at your site give you 2 days to work the load after that you pay demurrage for each day. Remember that a railcar does not have a driver waiting for it.

Ship Companies also charge demurrage after a negotiated time for loading or unloading. Their demurrage costs can be in the millions of dollars.

So what happened to detention pay in trucking? Congress refuses to talk about it because like in the case of Fuel Surcharges, they say it is tantamount to "Regulation". This is such hipocrisy on their part when they have REGULATED everything else in the trucking industry. If you think about it, the "Trucking Industry" is the most regulated "de-regulated" industry in America.

In my opinion, our elected officials do not want to upset the big industries that are contributing to their election campaigns by forcing them to pay what is fair to the Owner-Operators and Truck Drivers. If detention pay were mandatory the worst offending shippers/receivers would have to get their act together and run an efficient loading/unloading operation. More often than not the shippers and/or receivers schedule all incoming trucks to arrive at the same time, then it's first come first serve at the dock. To top it off at the receiving end a driver must pay for a lumper to unload his truck. The unloading can be done by the driver, but then he is left standing by his load for hours waiting for the receiver to count it and sign his bills. This is how many receiving companies handle it if you don't pay for them to unload their own freight. From my experience however this rule applies; "The more you are charged for a lumper, the longer it takes". Doesn't make sense but if you ask a trucker, he will agree.

 
Is Roseville, CA targetting Truckers? PDF Print E-mail
Written by David J   
Wednesday, 06 May 2009 17:00

ll-header1

While Roseville, CA, may have been named by Money Magazine as one of the top 100 best small cities to live in America in 2008, most truckers would disagree.

That’s because Roseville city officials have decided to change how police officers write traffic tickets in an effort to keep all of the fine revenue themselves. Their logic? Why share their profits with Placer County and the state if they “do all the work”?

The police department even conducted a three-month pilot program this past summer using truck drivers as their test subjects for violations such as restricted routes, load and license issues in order to gauge whether their new revenue enhancement strategy would be profitable.

The overwhelming response to their initial experiment was positive. And now Roseville has the cash in hand as proof.

Roseville – award-winning small city that it is – can’t pass along any more tax increases, it seems, to its own residents. So, instead, they are looking to prey on nonvoters and nonresidents, such as long-haul truckers.

Roseville Police Capt. Stan Lumsden even threw a little flattery truckers’ way in a Sacramento Bee article. He stated that drivers tend to pay their fines sooner and are less likely to contest the municipal code tickets than state code citations, which is another “benefit” to using the city code instead.

I’m sure that Capt. Lumsden’s shout-out to truckers will not give them a warm and fuzzy feeling, knowing they hit the “Roseville Favorite Violators” list because they are good payers.

Lumsden even bragged that those ticketed shouldn’t complain because of what a good deal it is. The municipal tickets will be offered at bargain prices because they will be cheaper than state-issued tickets. That’s because Roseville doesn’t have to divvy up the profits with county and state. Instead of having a $146 ticket and the city getting a measly $31 of it, Roseville can offer a discounted fine of $100. It’s cheaper for the perp and Roseville gets to keep it all.

However, Lumsden did want to make it clear that

the police department’s main objective is, of course, safety – not generating revenue. LL

 

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
New Jersey proposes new law PDF Print E-mail
Written by David J   
Thursday, 09 April 2009 17:00

law-school1Talk about putting the cart in front of the horse. New Jersey is proposing a law where drivers of motor vehicles must clear the snow and ice from their vehicles before they drive anywhere. The fines for not doing this will be from $25-75 and will not create points on your driving records. The fine money will then be used to build snow removal facilities for large commercial vehicles and of course other purposes. 
Truckers, you know the problem with this proposed law. The non-trucking citizens of America however may not realize the implications. What the law makers of New Jersey want us to do is climb on top of a 13'6" trailer on a daily basis to remove all accumulated snow and ice. Most trailers do not have a way of climbing up there, not safely anyway. Then clearing the ice? Isn't Ice rather slippery? How many drivers will have major injuries or even fall to their deaths while attempting this feet of acrobatics? This proposed law the way it is written is ludicrous. I propose that New Jersey first build the snow clearing facilities, then and only then enact this law. 
Below are links to the New Jersey Assembly bill S520 and to Land Line Magazine link to the story they wrote on the subject.

Please leave your comments on this topic also

http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2008/Bills/S1000/520_R3.HTM

 http://www.landlinemag.com/todays_news/Daily/2009/Jan09/012609/012709-03.htm

 
Times, They Are A Changing - or Repeating - a Good Thing PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tribal   
Tuesday, 02 March 2010 18:40

While sitting in my relaxing chair, at home & looking outside at the crappy weather mother nature has dealt all of us, I came across an article that says exactly what I have been saying for some time. Not that I have any more insight nor farsightedness than anyone else. It will Never be as it was in the old days, but it's going to get better, all the NAYSAYERS over the last few years get ready.

Through all the MAJOR BS that we deal with in day to day operations, it's coming to a head and Fast.  The voices of those of us who have survived this remaining recession and have managed to JUST SAY NO to Cheap Freight, relief is in sight. The article can be found here. Times, They are a Changing from Trucking Info.com. Let's ALL hope it pans out.

 



Sapphire Jewelry - Angara Inc.
Copyright © 2010 warontruckers.com. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.